Why is the VA punishing veterans who are trying to get off hard drugs?

Photo courtesy Pixabay

I have something stuck in my craw as it pertains to opioids, cannabis, PTSD, booze, and our veterans.

Let’s face it. We have a crisis at hand with service members returning from deployments with PTSD. Why wouldn’t they be coming home with PTSD in today’s world.

If you don’t know what PTSD is, in a nutshell you are pissed off and on edge. All the time. You may think the best way to medicate yourself is by drinking, but you quickly learn that is like throwing gasoline on a fire and makes you even more explosive.

Still, the VA isn’t going to know if you are drinking or not unless you tell them. Also, the VA probably is going to prescribe you benzodiazepines for your PTSD if they feel it cannot be handled with talk therapy or some other means.

Benzodiazepines such as Ativan and Xanax essentially are alcohol in a pill.

I’m sure veterans know the drill. I’m not a veteran, but I have met enough veterans with PTSD through my writing and during my travels earlier this year to know what I describe above is a common scenario.

Now, many veterans who are quick to realize the dangers of the booze decide to self-medicate with marijuana instead. However, since the VA now is drug testing apparently rather regularly, patients are being threatened to have their medications taken away unless they stop smoking pot.

I have talked to wives of service members who are fuming over this. They say the plant is the only thing that calms their husbands down.

I’m sure the same can be said of male spouses of female service members as well.

Of course, the opioid problem affects veterans too, because who other than men and women doing battle in war are going to need opioids more often for painful injuries? That problem runs so deep in the military it’s not even funny.

Veterans expected to meditate withdrawals away

In research published last month in Annals of Internal Medicine, a systematic review of 67 previous studies showed that life gets better for those who taper off opioids.

“Very low-quality evidence suggests that several types of interventions may be effective to reduce or discontinue LTOT and that pain, function, and quality of life may improve with opioid dose reduction,” the authors half-heartedly concluded.

The interventions that might be effective? Things like behavioral modifications, talk therapy and mindfulness.

Mindfulness is great for PTSD, too. It’s how I stayed sober when I wasn’t smoking the plant. But it doesn’t always work. And sometimes triggers can be so severe that some type of medication is warranted to keep from blowing a gasket.

That’s why so many people living with PTSD smoke weed.

It’s not realistic to expect tens of thousands of wounded veterans to just come home from war and taper off their opioids while meditating.

In an accompanying editorial to the Annals research, experts at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warn clinicians that “decisions to discontinue or reduce long-term opioid therapy should be made together with the patient. Clinicians have a responsibility to carefully manage opioid therapy and not abandon patients in chronic pain.”

Meanwhile, research published yesterday showed that cannabis is effective at treating neuropathic pain, even though the cannabis used pales in comparison to what’s commercially available. You can read my blog post here.

It’s one thing to require people to pay large sums of money to get the state-legal medication they need. Both the medical cannabis itself and the certification process is very expensive, at least in Illinois.

It’s another to then punish them beyond the pocketbook by making the transition from one medication to another as dangerous as possible.

Especially after they have served their country.

Tip Jar

Thank you for helping me by donating a small amount toward what I do. You can adjust the amount donated by scrolling the up and down arrows next to the $10 denomination

$10.00

This lady lost her caregiver son because the VA was too slow. Then she died right behind him.

monica

Some encouraging news published today in JAMA Surgery is coming too late for my next door neighbors.

That’s because Monica, a Scottish immigrant, and her son, Paul, both are now dead. Paul, who was in his early 50s, cared for his mom in the house they rented next door to me. Like myself, Paul clearly had troubles of his own and at times was overwhelmed by his mother, who also had dementia, like my dad, albeit in a much milder form (at least at first). Plus, Monica was about 90 years old.

And even though Paul and I never got along in the beginning, when he began to lose a lot of weight I asked him what was going on. He told me he had not been feeling well but could not get into the VA right away due to long wait times.

Finally, he got in there and they discovered he had a cancerous tumor in his colon. Then they scheduled the surgery – for several weeks out.

By the time they opened Paul up, he was full of cancer. He went into Hope Creek Nursing Home and died a short time later.

His mother, her heart broken that her only child was dead so young, began to exhibit worsening dementia. Daily home care wasn’t enough. She was coaxed from her home by the police (for her own safety), never to return. After a short stint at Galesburg Cottage Hospital (where unruly elderly people are taken from the Quad-Cities to be heavily medicated and made “manageable”) she returned to Hope Creek, and died.

A sad, sad story. She had become a ward of the state after Paul died; the state got every little thing she owned to pay she and Paul’s Hope Creek bills.

The house still has not been rented, and some of her belongings are still there. It’s a big old mess. His death, her death, the fact the landlord still can’t rent the house – all examples of multiple disgraces in the Illinois Quad-Cities elder care system and the state of Illinois in general, too numerous to mention. And to anyone who rolls their eyes at that comment, I say, go right ahead. Maybe you’ll find a brain up there.

But here’s the good news

The study released today in JAMA Surgery shows how reforms put in place at a VA pilot location in Indianapolis drastically reduced delays. Using Richard L. Roudebush Veterans Affairs Medical Center as a test site, “Multidisciplinary teams identified systemic inefficiencies and strategies to improve interdepartmental and patient communication to reduce canceled consultations and cases, diagnostic rework, and no-shows,” according to a JAMA news release. “High-priority triage with enhanced operating room flexibility was instituted to reduce scheduling wait times. General surgery department pilot projects were then implemented mid-fiscal year 2013.”

Wait times were shaved from 33 days in FY2012 to 12 days by FY2014. The number of patients operated on increased from 931 in FY2012 to 1072 in FY2014.

“This study demonstrated a significant reduction in patient wait times for surgical procedures and an improvement in access in the clinical and operative settings when implementing lean processes,” the authors wrote. “The improvement gained was noted over multiple areas and seen during the implementation of new technologies. The changes in the measured outcome categories occurred early, and the differences were sustained across the entire observation period.”

Tip Jar

Thank you for helping me by donating a small amount toward what I do. You can adjust the amount donated by scrolling the up and down arrows next to the $10 denomination

$10.00

The authors reported that a “systems redesign” involving “personnel, clinicians and surgical staff to reduce systemic inefficiencies” could work throughout the VA.

In an accompanying editorial, Drs. June Ray Juliet and Seth A. Spector of Miami wrote, “Widespread negative media attention targeting patient access and wait times at the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs institutions has prompted evidence-based reform to improve health care access and delivery.”

There goes that darned media, saving lives again.

“The stakes are high, and process, organization, and infrastructure must be reformed to ensure that health care delivery, research, education, and training proceed at the highest standard,” the editorial concludes. “This crisis provides the private and public sectors with an opportunity to consider lean transformations to expand access, reduce cost, and, most importantly, improve health outcomes and the patient experience.”